Richard vrijland sexdate

richard vrijland sexdate

Feces, Cadaver, Human penis, Vulva, and Nudity ) contain graphic pictures and detailed information easily available to anyone with access to the internet, including children. (subscription required) Neutral point of view. Printed books There are efforts to put a select subset of Wikipedia's articles into printed book form. For Wikipedia's policy concerning censorship, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored Wikipedia has been criticized for allowing information of graphic content.

Tranny sexdate, Gratis 50 sexdate, Als zakenman een sexdate, Speurders sexdate,

"3 Charts That Show How Wikipedia Is Running Out of Admins". "whois domain registration information results for m from Network Solutions". The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation, illustrations of zoophilia, and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles. "The Decline of Wikipedia". 230 In July 2013, after extensive beta testing, a wysiwyg (What You See Is What You Get) extension, VisualEditor, was opened to public use. Some, such as, Enciclopedia Libre, Hudong, and Baidu Baike likewise employ no formal review process, although some like Conservapedia are not as open. Perry Cox reacts to a patient who says that a Wikipedia article indicates that the raw food diet reverses the effects of bone cancer by retorting that the same editor who wrote that article also wrote the Battlestar Galactica episode guide. 51 Wikipedia blackout protest against sopa on January 18, 2012 A promotional video of the Wikimedia Foundation that encourages viewers to edit Wikipedia, mostly reviewing 2014 via Wikipedia content Milestones In January 2007, Wikipedia entered for the first time the top-ten list of the most.

79 This incident led to policy changes at Wikipedia, specifically targeted at tightening up the verifiability of biographical articles of living people. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 22, 2009. Retrieved April 19, 2010. 110 In 2008, a Slate magazine article reported that: "According to researchers in Palo Alto, 1 percent of Wikipedia users are responsible for about half of the site's edits." 111 This method of evaluating contributions was later disputed by Aaron Swartz, who noted that several.